Thanks posting this, and more importantly thanks to HBH for responding in a clear manner. It's the right thing to do of course.
Possibly our elected leaders could learn from this letter how to work with a negative situation. Apologies only work if accountability is taken, and reparation is not only stated, but made. I look forward to HBH continuing to lead the way based on what I've read.
A note on conflicts of interest, the part about the $50K donation. While I appreciate HBH stating that it had no influence I'd like to counter with my experience in COI's. An appearance of a COI, is a COI. You can't decouple this matter unless you engage a third party to make that decision on your behalf, with no knowledge of the previous donation.
This is why say law enforcement has rules about accepting gifts because even a cup of coffee can be viewed as creating a COI. Larger corporations, and even the County have rules about accepting gifts. If HBH wants to clear the air, give the $50K back, then make your decision.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts, MK. I agree that conflicts of interest must be handled carefully. At first glance, it can look complicated (so stay with me—I’ll explain what I mean). In many cases, the businesses most committed to HFH’s mission are those in the trades who want to support Habitat at multiple levels—providing both donations and services. For example, my own company donates materials and also supplies them at a discounted rate, ensuring we’re contributing to the mission rather than trying to solicit or influence business.
I understand that many folks are frustrated by Jamestown’s circumstances when bidding, and I’m really not here to debate that—it’s a situation influenced by federal regulations. That said, Jamestown has consistently provided low pricing and volunteered time on smaller projects. It might look like “buying goodwill,” and I can see how people might read it that way. Yet there’s also a tension when HFH is urged to accept the lowest bid, and Jamestown’s unique situation enables them to lower costs further. So, I do agree that a formal bidding process is key to reducing conflicts of interest, and those are steps in progress.
One final point: Habitat for Humanity has a governing Board of Directors—volunteers from a broad cross section of our community—who review projects and provide oversight. Although no board is infallible, it’s an important safeguard for ensuring responsible decision-making.
Thanks again for your comment. I appreciate the feedback and hope this adds some clarity to the discussion.
I do appreciate your response and information that clearly illustrates the mine field unique to your situation. I imagine the national HFH mothership likely has navigated similar waters previously and set up guidance that you're following. A few suggestions, have an independent Ethics advisor support your mission not only in reviews, but policy suggestions. Likewise, a blind bidding process from inception to decision could be a good control mechanism.
Wow! An actual what seems to be transparent conversation. I appreciate the response Mr. Steiger.
As I stated at the hearing I was really conflicted. I really believe in CCHFH and this project. I also believe the JKT has an unfair business advantage. The need to have a fair playing field for the business members in our community when public tax dollars such as the 800k opportunity fund are involved is paramount. Conflicts of interest are prevalent in this community. We are probably past the point of being fair, but one can always fight for it.
Seems to be a transparent conversation...seems being the operative here.
No one can fault HFH for the noble goal of creating affordable housing.
It's like winning the jackpot to have the 'support' of JKT and their vast resources to back the venture. However, Danny is either naive or willing to look the other way at how JKT is corrupting democratic process and willfully costing the county eventually millions of dollars by NGO influence and buying politicians (Ozias and others) You are dealing with a soulless entity appearing to do good for its own gain.
Good luck with your collusive venture with 'the tribe'.
The widely used definition of COI certainly fits in with your statement..."A Conflict of Interest is a set of circumstances that creates a risk that professional judgement or actions regarding a primary interest will be unduly influenced by a secondary interest" Primary interest refers to the principal goals of the profession.
Appearances matter. Say whatever you want... If it looks, walks and quacks like a duck what are we supposed to conclude? Things are true because you say its so? Not in this charged landscape. Put it out for bid or Habitat takes a black eye.
If Tribal Nations were truly interested in being part of United States of America, they would freely abandon the Favored First Nation Treaties that exist, rather than “DONATE’ $ while ‘TAKING’ $$$$ using tax exempt status. Keep tribal traditions alive while celebrating and participating equally with the rest of America. I think that would eliminate the conflict that seems to perpetuate the divide between TWO NATIONS, not “One Nation, Indivisible, Under God. Just a thought.
"Beware of Greeks bearing gifts." Any donation needs to be accepted with a degree of cynicism. Mr. Steigler seems to be someone who wants community engagement to be genuine and mutually beneficial. But we citizens just can't take his intent to be that of all involved in HfH. Stay alert and ask questions, just as Jeff has done and is doing. Many issues are coming up at the Board meetings that have the same conflicts of interest. Hopefully, HfH will become an example of good conflict resolution. Thank you, Jeff.
I can absolutely appreciate that. Actions speak louder than words, and in this case my explanation is just the beginning. We are having important conversations internally on the best way to move forward, not just on this, but in future dealings. The trust of the community is incredibly important to our mission, and I can promise that actions will follow the words. Thanks for being willing to listen and watch for actions.
Perception is reality. I have not heard any disparaging words about the work Habitat For Humanity accomplishes. One thousand 'atta boys' can be wiped out with one 'aw shucks'.
True formal bidding MUST be followed by ALL in order to preserve equity for ALL.
Thank you Jeff most of all for the amount of pressure it takes to try & hold the feet to the fire. I’m sorry I must be missing something while I read & watch this choreographed dance. I agree the letter as I read it is nothing more than a bunch of words on paper and not one bit of action except writing the letter and sending it. No action to correct an existing problem or wrong, not one. That is what I’m missing that others appear to see. All the items in letter go without saying for any project none of what was said is new or creative when it comes to the bidding process & how laws and policy dictate and have dictated the process, so please please without falling all over yourself help me out here.
Being understanding & accepting like most posters is nice however this is business & our community is paying while the tribe gets all the benefits when they are the absolute last who need it! How is that Habitat for Humanity?
After reading the response from Mr. Steiger my thoughts turned to. “Oh another AI produced letter”. One of we really stepped in it and I need to grease the wheels of apologies and understanding! Irritating political smiles, shake your hand let me get thru this so we can have a live together conversation! It was very hard to discern if you were apologizing or iterating your “missteps” (what a frustrating word).
After how long….. the abuse of power has gone one in this community???? Eyes are very wide open.
On the other hand…. Your real person voice appeared and you spoke more from your heart… I truly hope you are able to back up and see the “reputation” of whom you are working with. They for sure know they are being scrutinized at this point…
Kudos on stepping up…. You’re in a very small club….
A reasonable, thoughtful and plausible response. Yes we skirted the "system", but did so for the greater good. The irony of supporting prevailing wage and simultaneously finding it unaffordable is glaring. Which is the greater good; using cheap labor to provide housing for the unfortunate or paying the unfortunate prevailing wages to provide for themselves ? It is perhaps an unsolvable dilemma. I do not suspect malice of forethought, but creating exceptions to our system of laws, rules and practices is not the best answer.
Hi Garry, my desire was not to state that we skirted the system at all, but confirm that there were some missteps and items we could have done much better on. When no government funds are attached to a project (as is historically typical for HFH) there is no need to pay prevailing wages, which is how this project started. Once we found we were going to receive the funds it changes the game, and we were caught flat footed for sure, and we need to do better.
Prevailing wage is a challenging topic; yes, it does create higher wages for individuals, which is a good thing. At the same time, all of the subs working on this project would be making higher than a "living wage" and in many cases MUCH higher, even without prevailing wages. Most of the people who receive these houses are not in careers where prevailing wage is an option, and many are making below "living wage" income, or skirting the edge of it. In this way the prevailing wage is at the detriment of the people partnering to help build and ultimately purchase (and lower prices) their homes.
This is definitely a complicated process. I found this blurb online about prevailing wage impacts on affordable housing, though this is a complicated can of worms... We certainly aren't arguing that we should follow the rules, just sharing frustrations when we consider than the increase in paying prevailing wages may literally add up to the cost of 1 to 2 housing units. There's only so much butter to spread on the toast, so to speak, so we have to balance all of these things very carefully.
"Prevailing wage laws, while designed to ensure fair compensation for construction workers, can pose significant challenges for affordable housing projects. These laws often increase labor costs beyond local market rates, inflating overall project budgets and reducing the number of units that can be built within limited funding. Smaller non-union contractors may also be discouraged from participating due to administrative burdens, which can decrease competition and further drive up costs.
For affordable housing developers, these increased costs can lead to difficult trade-offs, such as cutting amenities, simplifying designs, or scaling back the scope of projects. In regions where prevailing wages exceed actual market wages, the financial strain is even greater, especially in rural areas where local rates are typically lower. Advocating for policy adjustments, like exemptions for affordable housing or streamlined compliance processes, could help balance fair labor practices with the urgent need for more affordable housing."
Too many laws. Who should decide what a living wage is, you, some clown in Olympia? How about the CRAFTSMAN, seeking work, AND the CONTRACTOR, seeking workers, deciding what the labor is worth. CHALLENGES you speak of affect all, not just Affordable Housing Developers. Having worked construction most of my career, I always understood the spirit of Prevailing Wage to mean the local area.
I believe the "livable wage" reports look at cost of living for a particular area and are tied to things like housing affordability and what not, but I agree, it's an ambiguous term.
I think you nailed the problem on the head... Prevailing wages are typically tied to the most expensive part of the state, in our case, Seattle metro area. As such, they are greatly inflated for our more rural county. I'm 100% in favor of paying our citizens appropriately, and in the trades it's been going in the right direction since we stumbled out of the last recession. Not saying its perfect, but when there is a 40% premium on prevailing wage because those are the wages in Seattle it actually negatively impacts our communities sometimes; smaller contractors do not have the admin staff to manage all of the paperwork for prevailing wage jobs, and even if they wanted to bid a project, since all the wages have to be prevailing, and major firm out of Seattle or any other out of area company, is much more likely to nab the work. It's a tangled mess with pro's and con's and I don't claim to have all the answers.
Your response is not acceptable enough under any measurements you want to claim, sorry. Laws are laws for very good reasons, and basically breaking your own ethics code calls all this into direct question which I don’t believe you’ve answered directly.
Sorry, if I missed your point. On this project, it was begun prior to any government funds being allocated. As such it did not fall under requirements to pay prevailing wages or to have a formalized bidding process (though as I've shared, HFH did receive a second bid, which was higher). As such there was no break in ethics and certainly no breaking of the law. Once the opportunity funds were offered it changed the game, and we're working on addressing this. It's very much our intention to follow all laws and more than that to be accountable and operate at the highest ethical standards. If I missed your point, I apologize, and I would be happy to elaborate, just let me know!
Also you state we received a higher bid? Higher bid? How does that process happen that you received a higher bid when you direct awarded to JKT and there was no process for other contractors to compete? Why would you feed project information to only 2 companies and accept ONLY their bids & not do an official bidding process? Is that somewhere in your policy? Please share this with the taxpayers so we can have a better understanding.
“Once the opportunity funds were offered it changed the game, and we're working on addressing this.” The question is what are you calling opportunity funds, the funds Jamestown gave you or County funds and dates. I’m not so sure again we’d even be having this conversation if the facts below weren’t pointed out where our taxpayer money is being spent and what it is being spent for, giving the advantage to JKT period for a whole lot of money!
Within minutes of Commissioner Randy Johnson swearing to serve a 3rd four-year term “faithfully and impartially,” an $800,000 tax-funded grant to Habitat for Humanity of Clallam County hit a snag.
“The prosecuting attorney’s office received, yesterday afternoon, a question regarding some of the issues that were raised in the hearing and testimony today,” began Dee Boughton, the County’s chief civil deputy prosecuting attorney. “Specifically, whether or not public works bidding requirements would apply, I think in particular, to the application made by Habitat for Humanity.”
Boughton said that questions have arisen regarding contracts Habitat for Humanity has entered into — specifically, the decision to award an estimated $2.6 million contract to the Jamestown Tribe without soliciting bids from its competitors.
Hence your immediate letter response. Pleading the case in public opinion does not make wrong right.
Non profit companies, like yours, ask for tax money (our money) to operate and are required to follow rules handed down by the State in order enjoy the spoils of "NON PROFIT" enterprise. It is the cost you pay for the tax status you receive. I think your goals are worthwhile, but is the cost of being hamstrung with regulations worth it. Do we, the money supplier, and the recipient of your services, really get as much benefit as we would if you operated without all the government intervention? I wonder. Maybe we the people will start looking at history to provide alternatives to our current crisis.
Hi Eric, thanks for sharing your thoughts! Just to clarify, our local Habitat for Humanity affiliate actually operates almost entirely without government funding. Most of our revenue comes from two places:
1. Our two ReStores, which fund a big part of our operations.
2. Private donations or grants—either monthly contributions or one-time gifts. For example, Lyon's Landing was named after someone who left a generous bequest in her will, and another major donation came from MacKenzie Scott.
That’s pretty much how we’ve always done it: little to no government funding and a rolling model—once we sell a home, the proceeds go toward building the next one. It’s worked really well so far.
However, as we move from building one home every 12–18 months to doing multiple homes in a year, we needed some extra funding to kick-start things. Once these larger projects get rolling, we can keep reinvesting the proceeds from completed homes into new builds, which reduces any reliance on government money.
Of course, being a nonprofit means we do get standard tax benefits, but I hear you on the strings that often come with government dollars. That’s actually what led to some of the bumps we’re dealing with now. We should have been more prepared and handled it differently, and I’m sorry for any confusion or frustration this caused.
I know words alone won’t fix everything, but we are taking action. We’re in touch with the county, reviewing our bidding processes, and planning updates. Our board of directors is also involved in shaping these next steps. I wanted to reach out sooner than later to share what’s going on, and I really appreciate the feedback as we move forward.
Thanks again for your input—it helps us improve and stay accountable to the community we serve. If you have more questions or suggestions, please keep the conversation going!
Hi Robert, I enjoy writing, and I'm passionate about finding constructive paths forward. I'm not one to get in yelling matches with anyone, and I find benefits to robust discussions, as I think they serve to improve all parties genuinely involved and looking to find paths forward. I'm also an aspiring writer!
That said, I'm also a volunteer member of the Board of Directors for Habitat for Humanity, and I believe passionately in the organization. I know the people in the trenches, and I know their hearts. When you are operating with the best of intentions and humility, it's not difficult to find reasonable answers, as there aren't secrets or ulterior motives. Now to be fair, good intentions cannot replace diligently working to make sure that you are operating in compliance - so don't mistake me for "excusing" areas where we need to fix things. That's the next step and one we are committed to tackling. While the executive committee has already started processes we need to have a full Board meeting, and also plan on creating a more transparent process so people can judge us not just by our words, but by our actions as well.
Danny is a solid guy that wants the best for our community. As a local business leader and member of the City Planning commission he understands the challenges we face. While the letter still leaves some doubts, his professionalism and candor should be a role model for many local businesses, non profits, City and County Staff, Council members and Commissioners.
Have any City Council members or County Commissioners ever responded to Clallam Watchdog's analysis in a timely and thoughtful manner? And then were willing to immediately follow-up in real time to comments on Substack or Facebook as well? Net/net, there will always be "spin" added to writing (which is why I stated the letter "left some doubts"), but I appreciated the willingness to engage.
I have met many locals that are thoughtful and professional - that regularly volunteer their time to try to help our community. Danny is one of them. I am on the board of two non profits, including the organization focused on the revitalization of the PA Waterfront. If you have the time, please sign up for many of the vacant council/committees, or get involved with other like minded individuals trying to improve our community.
The choice of the lowest bid is always the best choice. The problem as pointed out earlier is the unfairness of the taxex levied on nontribal entities. If any of you were building anything and you were presented with two bids from two competant builders you'd make the low bid choice. Again, it's down to our elected officials. We do this to ourselves with OUR choices at the ballot box.
FYI, there was no bidding process that is the major problem. This project did not go out to bid period! Yet HfH says they received 2 bids? The only way that can happen is if someone in HfH feeds project information to selected companies and then those 2 companies submit bids! This is so wrong on so many levels.
Hi Pepai, just to share, the other bid we received came from the developer who sold us the property, he gave us prices for just selling the land (permit ready, but raw) or for the land plus his company to do the development work. We were contemplating that approach, though after we announced that we received the property, JST reached out and asked to put together a quote.
I'm sorry that this is not satisfactory, and as I've said several times, I acknowledge that we should have thought through this process more thoroughly; as it happened we were thrilled at the opportunity to move forward and provide an opportunity for affordable home ownership for so many. Again, this is not an excuse. Just explaining how things happened.
We realize we now have work to do going forward to ensure that we are in full compliance, follow best practices, and maintain transparency.
> We’ve heard some concerns from local businesses about the opportunity to bid on this project, and we understand that such feedback often stems from a desire to contribute and be involved. However, it’s important to acknowledge the partnerships and contributions that have brought us to this point. Over the past two decades, we’ve been fortunate to receive direct support from builders and other community entities, including donated materials like lumber and countless hours of effort from volunteers, as well as discounted prices for work performed.
==========
I'm not exactly sure what this has to do with the lack of open bidding, but good on him for offering a relatively substantive response, and acknowledging the apparent lack of transparency and openness.
Thanks for posting this. There will be more elections in Clallam County in 2025. Keeping us informed on these local issues is extremely valuable as we talk to current and future candidates.
He complains about the cost of prevailing wages...how are people going to sustain these homes in the future if they don't have living wage jobs...yes the initial build cost is lower which helps but they still have usurious mortgages (mort=death...gage=measure... it's all planned out!) to support (subsidizing the corrupt banking system) and expensive maintenance protocols.
It is swimming against the current and making more and more people dependent on government and non-government sources to maintain their lives.
We need a whole new paradigm and the one we have is breaking down rapidly for all of us...it's a new era and whether we end up free or enslaved by government is up to us and God. Blessings to all.🤓
I am ok with a contract with JK for building, but it would be a healthy and good-neighborly action if there was a commitment to use a certain percentage of the workers from the public at large, so they can also share your benefits and working experiences to be able to stay in business. Make it part of the deal to not exclude non-tribal craftsmen and general workers from the workforce. My son needs to work too. Working beside Tribal members would be good for all. Its a two-way street.
Sorry Jean, JKT has already stated they have it covered with their 'emerging' workforce. Good idea though... for an inclusive and wisely run community!😊
No for-profit or not-for-profit agency should accept a bid for work WITHOUT going through a formal open bidding process. This is procurement 101 folks.
In the corporate world, someone would lose their job for this.
It makes me wonder, who is holding the reins at Habitat?
To be clear, this is not the fault of the board. Whomever is in the role to make the business decisions is not aware of basic business rules and should step down.
Thank you for sharing your concerns. I understand how you feel about the importance of formal bidding processes, and I agree that transparency is critical. At Habitat for Humanity of Clallam County, we’re learning and adapting as we move from building one house every 12–18 months to taking on much larger projects—projects that have the potential to benefit more families than ever before.
I do, however, want to express my strong support for Colleen Robinson’s leadership. She has played a key role in expanding Habitat’s capacity to serve the community, dedicating countless hours and unwavering compassion to the cause of affordable housing. Missteps can happen, especially when navigating new territory, but in every instance Colleen’s focus has been on fulfilling Habitat’s mission to help those in need.
We’re absolutely taking these concerns to heart. As we grow, we recognize the importance of clear procedures—including for bidding—and we’re working to improve in that area. Conversations like this are essential; we welcome the feedback and appreciate the community’s involvement in holding us accountable.
Thank you again for your input. It helps us strengthen our processes so we can continue serving Clallam County and beyond, with both integrity and compassion. If you’d like more information or to discuss how we’re moving forward, I’d be happy to connect further.
Hi Danny, I don't know you, but I can tell you are a decent and caring human being.
There is no doubt of the CEO's passion and dedication.
This is a question of education and having the necessary skillset to be in the CEO position. If the board decides to continue with the current CEO, it might be wise for that person to take advanced business courses and skill up to be fully fit for their role. The board has a fiduciary responsibility.
Thank you, I very much appreciate that. Colleen has certainly grown the organization dramatically, and as such has had to grow as well. I know she is committed to the cause, as well as her professional duties. The Board is currently supporting her with some of these measures, so her growth can keep up with the incredible growth she's generated within the organization, as I think it's important for us to grant her the tools to excel in her position.
I can't help but comment again on the stark difference in responses we are seeing here, as a result of the HFH letter. I beseach the CCC's and NGO'S funded by our tax dollars to see this as a model of community engagement. That or elect Danny at the next election for a Commissioner role.
Oh gosh... Thank you so much, though that's not a position I would envy! That said, I made a conscious decision some time ago to try hard not to complain about things that are wrong in our community (and there are many!) without being willing to be a part of the solution. It's not always easy, and I definitely don't always get it right, but I'm going to keep trying. I care very deeply for our community, and am passionate to help wherever I have the capacity.
Danny. Your words are well chosen and professionally delivered but they remain hollow in action. If you want to do things right, then do them correctly. Resubmit for the money you want to take from the citizen’s pocket for an honest project: open fair request with and a clear fair bidding process for the work. HFH came to the table with a locked down package prearranged in violation of County, State, and Federal law. If you want it to be correct, don’t tell people about it, do it. That would be honorable.
Otherwise this is just gaslighting us in hopes that we will not believe the facts and our own eyes but the same “oh what a tangled web we weave” we are used to from your pre-paid pre selected business partner.
We have seen this act for years. Transparently is what we seek, honesty is what we crave, and fairness is what we demand.
I certainly believe you have a true goal and don't doubt that you deeply care about our community. But it must take a wider view. I had to go back to August of 2023 when Jeff Tozzer started CCWatchdog. It really lays down what is happening in our community. His articles builds one on top of the other an understanding of what is happening and why there is distrust and frustrations. Honestly, read through. And yes, with your sincere outreach, I do believe you are being honest.
Thanks posting this, and more importantly thanks to HBH for responding in a clear manner. It's the right thing to do of course.
Possibly our elected leaders could learn from this letter how to work with a negative situation. Apologies only work if accountability is taken, and reparation is not only stated, but made. I look forward to HBH continuing to lead the way based on what I've read.
A note on conflicts of interest, the part about the $50K donation. While I appreciate HBH stating that it had no influence I'd like to counter with my experience in COI's. An appearance of a COI, is a COI. You can't decouple this matter unless you engage a third party to make that decision on your behalf, with no knowledge of the previous donation.
This is why say law enforcement has rules about accepting gifts because even a cup of coffee can be viewed as creating a COI. Larger corporations, and even the County have rules about accepting gifts. If HBH wants to clear the air, give the $50K back, then make your decision.
Best of luck HBH.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts, MK. I agree that conflicts of interest must be handled carefully. At first glance, it can look complicated (so stay with me—I’ll explain what I mean). In many cases, the businesses most committed to HFH’s mission are those in the trades who want to support Habitat at multiple levels—providing both donations and services. For example, my own company donates materials and also supplies them at a discounted rate, ensuring we’re contributing to the mission rather than trying to solicit or influence business.
I understand that many folks are frustrated by Jamestown’s circumstances when bidding, and I’m really not here to debate that—it’s a situation influenced by federal regulations. That said, Jamestown has consistently provided low pricing and volunteered time on smaller projects. It might look like “buying goodwill,” and I can see how people might read it that way. Yet there’s also a tension when HFH is urged to accept the lowest bid, and Jamestown’s unique situation enables them to lower costs further. So, I do agree that a formal bidding process is key to reducing conflicts of interest, and those are steps in progress.
One final point: Habitat for Humanity has a governing Board of Directors—volunteers from a broad cross section of our community—who review projects and provide oversight. Although no board is infallible, it’s an important safeguard for ensuring responsible decision-making.
Thanks again for your comment. I appreciate the feedback and hope this adds some clarity to the discussion.
I do appreciate your response and information that clearly illustrates the mine field unique to your situation. I imagine the national HFH mothership likely has navigated similar waters previously and set up guidance that you're following. A few suggestions, have an independent Ethics advisor support your mission not only in reviews, but policy suggestions. Likewise, a blind bidding process from inception to decision could be a good control mechanism.
Wow! An actual what seems to be transparent conversation. I appreciate the response Mr. Steiger.
As I stated at the hearing I was really conflicted. I really believe in CCHFH and this project. I also believe the JKT has an unfair business advantage. The need to have a fair playing field for the business members in our community when public tax dollars such as the 800k opportunity fund are involved is paramount. Conflicts of interest are prevalent in this community. We are probably past the point of being fair, but one can always fight for it.
Seems to be a transparent conversation...seems being the operative here.
No one can fault HFH for the noble goal of creating affordable housing.
It's like winning the jackpot to have the 'support' of JKT and their vast resources to back the venture. However, Danny is either naive or willing to look the other way at how JKT is corrupting democratic process and willfully costing the county eventually millions of dollars by NGO influence and buying politicians (Ozias and others) You are dealing with a soulless entity appearing to do good for its own gain.
Good luck with your collusive venture with 'the tribe'.
Ah, yes. Wording is important isn’t it? I don’t think I could have eloquently stated my experience in county governing as you did.
Thank you for this collaboration with Watchdog.
The widely used definition of COI certainly fits in with your statement..."A Conflict of Interest is a set of circumstances that creates a risk that professional judgement or actions regarding a primary interest will be unduly influenced by a secondary interest" Primary interest refers to the principal goals of the profession.
Thank you MK
Appearances matter. Say whatever you want... If it looks, walks and quacks like a duck what are we supposed to conclude? Things are true because you say its so? Not in this charged landscape. Put it out for bid or Habitat takes a black eye.
If Tribal Nations were truly interested in being part of United States of America, they would freely abandon the Favored First Nation Treaties that exist, rather than “DONATE’ $ while ‘TAKING’ $$$$ using tax exempt status. Keep tribal traditions alive while celebrating and participating equally with the rest of America. I think that would eliminate the conflict that seems to perpetuate the divide between TWO NATIONS, not “One Nation, Indivisible, Under God. Just a thought.
THIS 👆🏻
We may need a history lesson.
YES!😀
"Beware of Greeks bearing gifts." Any donation needs to be accepted with a degree of cynicism. Mr. Steigler seems to be someone who wants community engagement to be genuine and mutually beneficial. But we citizens just can't take his intent to be that of all involved in HfH. Stay alert and ask questions, just as Jeff has done and is doing. Many issues are coming up at the Board meetings that have the same conflicts of interest. Hopefully, HfH will become an example of good conflict resolution. Thank you, Jeff.
I can absolutely appreciate that. Actions speak louder than words, and in this case my explanation is just the beginning. We are having important conversations internally on the best way to move forward, not just on this, but in future dealings. The trust of the community is incredibly important to our mission, and I can promise that actions will follow the words. Thanks for being willing to listen and watch for actions.
Thank You Danny! Your joining CCWatchdog is just what we need for transparency.
Perception is reality. I have not heard any disparaging words about the work Habitat For Humanity accomplishes. One thousand 'atta boys' can be wiped out with one 'aw shucks'.
True formal bidding MUST be followed by ALL in order to preserve equity for ALL.
Thank you Jeff most of all for the amount of pressure it takes to try & hold the feet to the fire. I’m sorry I must be missing something while I read & watch this choreographed dance. I agree the letter as I read it is nothing more than a bunch of words on paper and not one bit of action except writing the letter and sending it. No action to correct an existing problem or wrong, not one. That is what I’m missing that others appear to see. All the items in letter go without saying for any project none of what was said is new or creative when it comes to the bidding process & how laws and policy dictate and have dictated the process, so please please without falling all over yourself help me out here.
Being understanding & accepting like most posters is nice however this is business & our community is paying while the tribe gets all the benefits when they are the absolute last who need it! How is that Habitat for Humanity?
Lot of lipstick on this pig….
You are welcome, Pepai.
You see clearly!
After reading the response from Mr. Steiger my thoughts turned to. “Oh another AI produced letter”. One of we really stepped in it and I need to grease the wheels of apologies and understanding! Irritating political smiles, shake your hand let me get thru this so we can have a live together conversation! It was very hard to discern if you were apologizing or iterating your “missteps” (what a frustrating word).
After how long….. the abuse of power has gone one in this community???? Eyes are very wide open.
On the other hand…. Your real person voice appeared and you spoke more from your heart… I truly hope you are able to back up and see the “reputation” of whom you are working with. They for sure know they are being scrutinized at this point…
Kudos on stepping up…. You’re in a very small club….
Oh, how we want to BELIEVE!😳
A reasonable, thoughtful and plausible response. Yes we skirted the "system", but did so for the greater good. The irony of supporting prevailing wage and simultaneously finding it unaffordable is glaring. Which is the greater good; using cheap labor to provide housing for the unfortunate or paying the unfortunate prevailing wages to provide for themselves ? It is perhaps an unsolvable dilemma. I do not suspect malice of forethought, but creating exceptions to our system of laws, rules and practices is not the best answer.
Hi Garry, my desire was not to state that we skirted the system at all, but confirm that there were some missteps and items we could have done much better on. When no government funds are attached to a project (as is historically typical for HFH) there is no need to pay prevailing wages, which is how this project started. Once we found we were going to receive the funds it changes the game, and we were caught flat footed for sure, and we need to do better.
Prevailing wage is a challenging topic; yes, it does create higher wages for individuals, which is a good thing. At the same time, all of the subs working on this project would be making higher than a "living wage" and in many cases MUCH higher, even without prevailing wages. Most of the people who receive these houses are not in careers where prevailing wage is an option, and many are making below "living wage" income, or skirting the edge of it. In this way the prevailing wage is at the detriment of the people partnering to help build and ultimately purchase (and lower prices) their homes.
This is definitely a complicated process. I found this blurb online about prevailing wage impacts on affordable housing, though this is a complicated can of worms... We certainly aren't arguing that we should follow the rules, just sharing frustrations when we consider than the increase in paying prevailing wages may literally add up to the cost of 1 to 2 housing units. There's only so much butter to spread on the toast, so to speak, so we have to balance all of these things very carefully.
"Prevailing wage laws, while designed to ensure fair compensation for construction workers, can pose significant challenges for affordable housing projects. These laws often increase labor costs beyond local market rates, inflating overall project budgets and reducing the number of units that can be built within limited funding. Smaller non-union contractors may also be discouraged from participating due to administrative burdens, which can decrease competition and further drive up costs.
For affordable housing developers, these increased costs can lead to difficult trade-offs, such as cutting amenities, simplifying designs, or scaling back the scope of projects. In regions where prevailing wages exceed actual market wages, the financial strain is even greater, especially in rural areas where local rates are typically lower. Advocating for policy adjustments, like exemptions for affordable housing or streamlined compliance processes, could help balance fair labor practices with the urgent need for more affordable housing."
Too many laws. Who should decide what a living wage is, you, some clown in Olympia? How about the CRAFTSMAN, seeking work, AND the CONTRACTOR, seeking workers, deciding what the labor is worth. CHALLENGES you speak of affect all, not just Affordable Housing Developers. Having worked construction most of my career, I always understood the spirit of Prevailing Wage to mean the local area.
I believe the "livable wage" reports look at cost of living for a particular area and are tied to things like housing affordability and what not, but I agree, it's an ambiguous term.
I think you nailed the problem on the head... Prevailing wages are typically tied to the most expensive part of the state, in our case, Seattle metro area. As such, they are greatly inflated for our more rural county. I'm 100% in favor of paying our citizens appropriately, and in the trades it's been going in the right direction since we stumbled out of the last recession. Not saying its perfect, but when there is a 40% premium on prevailing wage because those are the wages in Seattle it actually negatively impacts our communities sometimes; smaller contractors do not have the admin staff to manage all of the paperwork for prevailing wage jobs, and even if they wanted to bid a project, since all the wages have to be prevailing, and major firm out of Seattle or any other out of area company, is much more likely to nab the work. It's a tangled mess with pro's and con's and I don't claim to have all the answers.
Your response is not acceptable enough under any measurements you want to claim, sorry. Laws are laws for very good reasons, and basically breaking your own ethics code calls all this into direct question which I don’t believe you’ve answered directly.
You go, Pepai!🥳
Sorry, if I missed your point. On this project, it was begun prior to any government funds being allocated. As such it did not fall under requirements to pay prevailing wages or to have a formalized bidding process (though as I've shared, HFH did receive a second bid, which was higher). As such there was no break in ethics and certainly no breaking of the law. Once the opportunity funds were offered it changed the game, and we're working on addressing this. It's very much our intention to follow all laws and more than that to be accountable and operate at the highest ethical standards. If I missed your point, I apologize, and I would be happy to elaborate, just let me know!
My point is we wouldn’t even be having this conversation if it weren’t for what’s included in the following
https://www.habitat.org/sites/default/files/documents/Habitat_for_Humanity_Federal_Policy_Agenda-Resource.pdf
Also you state we received a higher bid? Higher bid? How does that process happen that you received a higher bid when you direct awarded to JKT and there was no process for other contractors to compete? Why would you feed project information to only 2 companies and accept ONLY their bids & not do an official bidding process? Is that somewhere in your policy? Please share this with the taxpayers so we can have a better understanding.
“Once the opportunity funds were offered it changed the game, and we're working on addressing this.” The question is what are you calling opportunity funds, the funds Jamestown gave you or County funds and dates. I’m not so sure again we’d even be having this conversation if the facts below weren’t pointed out where our taxpayer money is being spent and what it is being spent for, giving the advantage to JKT period for a whole lot of money!
Within minutes of Commissioner Randy Johnson swearing to serve a 3rd four-year term “faithfully and impartially,” an $800,000 tax-funded grant to Habitat for Humanity of Clallam County hit a snag.
“The prosecuting attorney’s office received, yesterday afternoon, a question regarding some of the issues that were raised in the hearing and testimony today,” began Dee Boughton, the County’s chief civil deputy prosecuting attorney. “Specifically, whether or not public works bidding requirements would apply, I think in particular, to the application made by Habitat for Humanity.”
Boughton said that questions have arisen regarding contracts Habitat for Humanity has entered into — specifically, the decision to award an estimated $2.6 million contract to the Jamestown Tribe without soliciting bids from its competitors.
Hence your immediate letter response. Pleading the case in public opinion does not make wrong right.
Non profit companies, like yours, ask for tax money (our money) to operate and are required to follow rules handed down by the State in order enjoy the spoils of "NON PROFIT" enterprise. It is the cost you pay for the tax status you receive. I think your goals are worthwhile, but is the cost of being hamstrung with regulations worth it. Do we, the money supplier, and the recipient of your services, really get as much benefit as we would if you operated without all the government intervention? I wonder. Maybe we the people will start looking at history to provide alternatives to our current crisis.
Hi Eric, thanks for sharing your thoughts! Just to clarify, our local Habitat for Humanity affiliate actually operates almost entirely without government funding. Most of our revenue comes from two places:
1. Our two ReStores, which fund a big part of our operations.
2. Private donations or grants—either monthly contributions or one-time gifts. For example, Lyon's Landing was named after someone who left a generous bequest in her will, and another major donation came from MacKenzie Scott.
That’s pretty much how we’ve always done it: little to no government funding and a rolling model—once we sell a home, the proceeds go toward building the next one. It’s worked really well so far.
However, as we move from building one home every 12–18 months to doing multiple homes in a year, we needed some extra funding to kick-start things. Once these larger projects get rolling, we can keep reinvesting the proceeds from completed homes into new builds, which reduces any reliance on government money.
Of course, being a nonprofit means we do get standard tax benefits, but I hear you on the strings that often come with government dollars. That’s actually what led to some of the bumps we’re dealing with now. We should have been more prepared and handled it differently, and I’m sorry for any confusion or frustration this caused.
I know words alone won’t fix everything, but we are taking action. We’re in touch with the county, reviewing our bidding processes, and planning updates. Our board of directors is also involved in shaping these next steps. I wanted to reach out sooner than later to share what’s going on, and I really appreciate the feedback as we move forward.
Thanks again for your input—it helps us improve and stay accountable to the community we serve. If you have more questions or suggestions, please keep the conversation going!
Beware someone who has a smooth answer for everything.🥸
Hi Robert, I enjoy writing, and I'm passionate about finding constructive paths forward. I'm not one to get in yelling matches with anyone, and I find benefits to robust discussions, as I think they serve to improve all parties genuinely involved and looking to find paths forward. I'm also an aspiring writer!
That said, I'm also a volunteer member of the Board of Directors for Habitat for Humanity, and I believe passionately in the organization. I know the people in the trenches, and I know their hearts. When you are operating with the best of intentions and humility, it's not difficult to find reasonable answers, as there aren't secrets or ulterior motives. Now to be fair, good intentions cannot replace diligently working to make sure that you are operating in compliance - so don't mistake me for "excusing" areas where we need to fix things. That's the next step and one we are committed to tackling. While the executive committee has already started processes we need to have a full Board meeting, and also plan on creating a more transparent process so people can judge us not just by our words, but by our actions as well.
It's hard to see the problem when your benefactor IS the problem! Cheers.🤔
Good one Gary!😎
Danny is a solid guy that wants the best for our community. As a local business leader and member of the City Planning commission he understands the challenges we face. While the letter still leaves some doubts, his professionalism and candor should be a role model for many local businesses, non profits, City and County Staff, Council members and Commissioners.
Here, here!
Mic drop.
Sorry I missed the candor...it was obscured by the 'schmooze.'😘
Have any City Council members or County Commissioners ever responded to Clallam Watchdog's analysis in a timely and thoughtful manner? And then were willing to immediately follow-up in real time to comments on Substack or Facebook as well? Net/net, there will always be "spin" added to writing (which is why I stated the letter "left some doubts"), but I appreciated the willingness to engage.
Time tells all...eventually...glad you have faith in Danny, etc.🙂
I have met many locals that are thoughtful and professional - that regularly volunteer their time to try to help our community. Danny is one of them. I am on the board of two non profits, including the organization focused on the revitalization of the PA Waterfront. If you have the time, please sign up for many of the vacant council/committees, or get involved with other like minded individuals trying to improve our community.
The choice of the lowest bid is always the best choice. The problem as pointed out earlier is the unfairness of the taxex levied on nontribal entities. If any of you were building anything and you were presented with two bids from two competant builders you'd make the low bid choice. Again, it's down to our elected officials. We do this to ourselves with OUR choices at the ballot box.
FYI, there was no bidding process that is the major problem. This project did not go out to bid period! Yet HfH says they received 2 bids? The only way that can happen is if someone in HfH feeds project information to selected companies and then those 2 companies submit bids! This is so wrong on so many levels.
Hi Pepai, just to share, the other bid we received came from the developer who sold us the property, he gave us prices for just selling the land (permit ready, but raw) or for the land plus his company to do the development work. We were contemplating that approach, though after we announced that we received the property, JST reached out and asked to put together a quote.
I'm sorry that this is not satisfactory, and as I've said several times, I acknowledge that we should have thought through this process more thoroughly; as it happened we were thrilled at the opportunity to move forward and provide an opportunity for affordable home ownership for so many. Again, this is not an excuse. Just explaining how things happened.
We realize we now have work to do going forward to ensure that we are in full compliance, follow best practices, and maintain transparency.
Danny, what is the reason you don’t think through the process more throughly now?
> We’ve heard some concerns from local businesses about the opportunity to bid on this project, and we understand that such feedback often stems from a desire to contribute and be involved. However, it’s important to acknowledge the partnerships and contributions that have brought us to this point. Over the past two decades, we’ve been fortunate to receive direct support from builders and other community entities, including donated materials like lumber and countless hours of effort from volunteers, as well as discounted prices for work performed.
==========
I'm not exactly sure what this has to do with the lack of open bidding, but good on him for offering a relatively substantive response, and acknowledging the apparent lack of transparency and openness.
Yep...acknowledge the 'wrongdoing' and soldier on like nothing happened...that's the paradigm.🤪
Thanks for posting this. There will be more elections in Clallam County in 2025. Keeping us informed on these local issues is extremely valuable as we talk to current and future candidates.
He complains about the cost of prevailing wages...how are people going to sustain these homes in the future if they don't have living wage jobs...yes the initial build cost is lower which helps but they still have usurious mortgages (mort=death...gage=measure... it's all planned out!) to support (subsidizing the corrupt banking system) and expensive maintenance protocols.
It is swimming against the current and making more and more people dependent on government and non-government sources to maintain their lives.
We need a whole new paradigm and the one we have is breaking down rapidly for all of us...it's a new era and whether we end up free or enslaved by government is up to us and God. Blessings to all.🤓
Hear. Hear Robert. Well said and well written.
Thanks Tom...we do what we can.🙂
I am ok with a contract with JK for building, but it would be a healthy and good-neighborly action if there was a commitment to use a certain percentage of the workers from the public at large, so they can also share your benefits and working experiences to be able to stay in business. Make it part of the deal to not exclude non-tribal craftsmen and general workers from the workforce. My son needs to work too. Working beside Tribal members would be good for all. Its a two-way street.
Sorry Jean, JKT has already stated they have it covered with their 'emerging' workforce. Good idea though... for an inclusive and wisely run community!😊
No for-profit or not-for-profit agency should accept a bid for work WITHOUT going through a formal open bidding process. This is procurement 101 folks.
In the corporate world, someone would lose their job for this.
It makes me wonder, who is holding the reins at Habitat?
To be clear, this is not the fault of the board. Whomever is in the role to make the business decisions is not aware of basic business rules and should step down.
Thank you for sharing your concerns. I understand how you feel about the importance of formal bidding processes, and I agree that transparency is critical. At Habitat for Humanity of Clallam County, we’re learning and adapting as we move from building one house every 12–18 months to taking on much larger projects—projects that have the potential to benefit more families than ever before.
I do, however, want to express my strong support for Colleen Robinson’s leadership. She has played a key role in expanding Habitat’s capacity to serve the community, dedicating countless hours and unwavering compassion to the cause of affordable housing. Missteps can happen, especially when navigating new territory, but in every instance Colleen’s focus has been on fulfilling Habitat’s mission to help those in need.
We’re absolutely taking these concerns to heart. As we grow, we recognize the importance of clear procedures—including for bidding—and we’re working to improve in that area. Conversations like this are essential; we welcome the feedback and appreciate the community’s involvement in holding us accountable.
Thank you again for your input. It helps us strengthen our processes so we can continue serving Clallam County and beyond, with both integrity and compassion. If you’d like more information or to discuss how we’re moving forward, I’d be happy to connect further.
Hi Danny, I don't know you, but I can tell you are a decent and caring human being.
There is no doubt of the CEO's passion and dedication.
This is a question of education and having the necessary skillset to be in the CEO position. If the board decides to continue with the current CEO, it might be wise for that person to take advanced business courses and skill up to be fully fit for their role. The board has a fiduciary responsibility.
Thank you, I very much appreciate that. Colleen has certainly grown the organization dramatically, and as such has had to grow as well. I know she is committed to the cause, as well as her professional duties. The Board is currently supporting her with some of these measures, so her growth can keep up with the incredible growth she's generated within the organization, as I think it's important for us to grant her the tools to excel in her position.
Cheers!
Lenin, Stalin, Hitler and Mao were all 'dedicated to the cause.'
And it all sounded real nice until the SHTF!
I can't help but comment again on the stark difference in responses we are seeing here, as a result of the HFH letter. I beseach the CCC's and NGO'S funded by our tax dollars to see this as a model of community engagement. That or elect Danny at the next election for a Commissioner role.
Oh gosh... Thank you so much, though that's not a position I would envy! That said, I made a conscious decision some time ago to try hard not to complain about things that are wrong in our community (and there are many!) without being willing to be a part of the solution. It's not always easy, and I definitely don't always get it right, but I'm going to keep trying. I care very deeply for our community, and am passionate to help wherever I have the capacity.
Danny. Your words are well chosen and professionally delivered but they remain hollow in action. If you want to do things right, then do them correctly. Resubmit for the money you want to take from the citizen’s pocket for an honest project: open fair request with and a clear fair bidding process for the work. HFH came to the table with a locked down package prearranged in violation of County, State, and Federal law. If you want it to be correct, don’t tell people about it, do it. That would be honorable.
Otherwise this is just gaslighting us in hopes that we will not believe the facts and our own eyes but the same “oh what a tangled web we weave” we are used to from your pre-paid pre selected business partner.
We have seen this act for years. Transparently is what we seek, honesty is what we crave, and fairness is what we demand.
I certainly believe you have a true goal and don't doubt that you deeply care about our community. But it must take a wider view. I had to go back to August of 2023 when Jeff Tozzer started CCWatchdog. It really lays down what is happening in our community. His articles builds one on top of the other an understanding of what is happening and why there is distrust and frustrations. Honestly, read through. And yes, with your sincere outreach, I do believe you are being honest.
Let's not be too hasty MK.
If it sounds too good to be true...🧐